Sunday, May 07, 2006


QUOTE (self explanatory article - no comments)

Freedom House, a Washington based organization founded by Eleanor Roosevelt, and now chaired by former C.I.A. Director, James Woolsey, conducted a survey of literature found in America’s leading Mosques. They came to three conclusions, two of which were accurate. The Saudi government and royal family are the primary purveyors of Islamic religious materials in America and worldwide. The overwhelming majority of the Islamic literature printed by the Saudi government and distributed in American mosques and Islamic schools is uncivilized, hateful, violent, and treasonous. But then they claimed, without evidence or reason, that such materials were reflective of Wahhabi extremism, and were therefore a corruption of Islam!!!!?????? .

Freedom House’s stated bias for religious tolerance may have contributed to their error, but I suspect their deceptive view is more likely born of complete ignorance. They analyzed 200 books and pamphlets but didn’t bother reviewing the only five that actually mattered: Ibn Ishaq’s Sira (the only biographical account of Muhammad written within 200 years of his death), Tabari’s Ta’rikh (Islam’s earliest and most authentic history of Muhammad and his formation of Islam), the topical Hadith of Bukhari and Muslim (Islam’s most revered collection of Muhammad’s words and deeds), and the Qur’an (a book devoid of context and chronology and thus dependent upon the Sira, Ta’rikh, and Hadith accounts). These prime sources contain all that is known about Muhammad, his god, and his religion. They are fundamental Islam.

I am pleased that Freedom House conducted this survey, translated these documents, and made the incriminating evidence available to everyone for free. The very survival of the civilized world is dependent upon us understanding that Islam is mankind’s greatest enemy. Yet, I am deeply disturbed by their continual positioning of Islam’s uncivil and treasonous rhetoric as representing a corrupted and extremist view when most every word of what they uncovered came directly out of the Qur’an, Sira, Ta’rikh, and Hadith—collectively the Islamic scriptures. To infer that Saudi Wahhabism is an inaccurate view of Islam is equivalent to saying that Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, and Paul presented an inaccurate and extremist view of Christianity.

If America is going to survive, average Americans must do two things our religious leaders, politicians, scholars, and media are either unable or unwilling to accomplish simultaneously. We must come to know and then think. Freedom House was generous in making this vital information about the nature of the Saudis and Islam available, but their unthinking commentary on it renders it unusable.

When we don’t know, we can’t think—as understanding the relationship between things is the essence of thinking. So when we don’t think, we cannot understand these vital relationships.

Freedom House came to the conclusion that the best way to eliminate the threat of hatful and violent “Wahhabi” Islam, and to save America, was to ask Islamic imams to remove the Saudi government literature from their mosques and schools. But since these materials are all based on the Islamic scriptures, it would be like removing a bucket of water from the ocean.

This strategy is analogous to America’s “War on Terrorism.” It’s senseless and useless. Islam is the enemy; terror is just a tactic. And so long as we obfuscate the source of our pain and lash out blindly at its symptoms, or “tactics,” Islam will manufacture 100 new Jihadists for every 1 we kill.

Freedom House trumpets another deadly misconception in their article as well—that of moderate Muslims and Islamic reform. The sole arbitrator on the subject, Muhammad, said in his Qur’an that a Muslim who does not leave his home to fight Jihad in Allah’s Cause ceases to be a Muslim. Allah calls them “hypocrites” in the 9th surah and orders good Jihadist Muslims to kill them in the 4th, so that he can personally attend to their torture in hell. As for reform, Islam’s lone prophet said, “Islam cannot change.” And in that regard, he was a prophet. This "religion" is just as deceitful, destructive, and deadly as it was when Muhammad was inventing it in a milieu of mass murders, piracy, rape, plunder and slavery. Reforming Islam is akin to thwarting Nazism by asking Hitler to edit the most deceitful, destructive, and deadly passages out of Mein Kampf.

Knowing that the very survival of the free world is at stake, under the auspisus of the Fair Use Doctrine, I am going to share some of what Freedom House discovered in America’s mosques, all the while challenging their commentary. I want you to know what contemporary Muslims are saying. I want you to know that contemporary Islam is indistinguishable from fundamental Islam. And I want you to know that ignorance of Islam, and toleration of it, will cause Americans to lose all we hold dear—our freedoms, our property and our lives. REPORT ON SAUDI GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS REPORT ON SAUDI GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS

Center for Religious Freedom
Freedom House

Copyright © 2005 by Freedom House, Published by the Center for Religious Freedom, All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner without the written permission of Freedom House, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Center for Religious Freedom

Freedom House
1319 18th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-296-5101, Fax: 202-296-5078


The CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM is a division of Freedom House. Founded more than sixty years ago by Eleanor Roosevelt, Wendell Willkie, and other Americans concerned with the mounting threats to peace and democracy, Freedom House has been a vigorous proponent of democratic values and a steadfast opponent of dictatorship of the far left and the far right. Its Center for Religious Freedom defends against religious persecution of all groups throughout the world. It insists that U.S foreign policy defend those persecuted for their religion or beliefs around the world, and advocates the right to religious freedom for every individual.

Since its inception in 1986, the Center, under the leadership of human rights lawyer Nina
Shea, has reported on the religious persecution of individuals and groups abroad and undertaken advocacy on their behalf in the media, Congress, State Department, and the White House. It also sponsors investigative field missions.

It’s interesting that FH was founded by Eleanor Roosevelt. FDR had little regard for the covenants of our forefathers and enacted all manner of socialist entitlement programs in direct conflict with the United States Constitution. He not only ruled like a dictator, his decisions caused two billion people to live under dictatorial tyranny. And there are no dictatorships of the far right. A tyranny is by definition a liberal use of power. Hitler was a socialist. His National Socialist German Workers Party exercised greater control over the nation and labor than did Stalin’s U.S.S.R.


Freedom House is deeply appreciative of the volunteers and expert consultants who helped in the preparation of this report. The research, translation and principle analysis of the materials for the report were carried out by both Muslims and non-Muslims who wish to remain anonymous for reasons of security. In light of the recent targeted assassination and death threats for speaking out against Islamic extremism in the Netherlands, such concerns appear especially valid. All involved did so out of a conviction that the Saudi Arabian publications in this study, which espouse an ideology of hate and purport to be the authoritative interpretation of Islam, continue to be in plentiful supply at some of our nation’s main mosques and continue to be used as principal educational resources on Islam for Muslims in America. We also wish to acknowledge the many Muslims who have requested our help in exposing Saudi extremism in the hope of freeing their communities from ideological strangulation; they have done so in the firm belief that public awareness of this problem will prompt the moderate majority of American Muslims to take steps to remedy it.

Yes, it is true, Islam is deadly and Muslims are ruthless murderers—killing those with the courage and character to expose them. But it is folly to believe these barbaric acts are perpetrated to serve the interests of the Saudi dictators rather than the Cause of Allah. Moreover, since 80% of the mosques in America are connected in one way or another to Saudi funds or sponsorship, how can “the majority of American Muslims” be “moderate?” Who is their prophet? Who is their god? What are their scriptures? If the answer to any of these is Muhammad, Allah, the Qur’an and Hadith, their religion cannot be “moderate,” no matter how one defines the term.


Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom decided to undertake this project after a number of Muslims and other experts publicly raised concerns about Saudi state influence on American religious life. This report complements a May 2003 recommendation of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, an independent government agency, that the U.S. government conduct a study on Saudi involvement in propagating internationally a “religious ideology that explicitly promotes hate, intolerance, and other human rights violations, and in some cases violence, toward members of other religious groups, both Muslims and non-Muslims.” In releasing this report, the Center is also mindful of one of the key findings of the 9/11 Commission Report: “Education that teaches tolerance, the dignity and value of each individual, and respect for different beliefs is a key element in any global strategy to eliminate Islamist terrorism.”

Very little the 9/11 Commission wrote was “mindful.” I have posted a review of the Commission’s Report on the site.

Education doesn’t teach tolerance. Like hate, tolerance is the byproduct of indoctrination. To be educated is to know and to think. To be tolerant is to not know and to not think. The least compassionate thing a society can do is to be tolerant of the merciless ideology of Islam. The tolerance of Islam will exacerbate terrorism, not eliminate it.

To be educated about Islam is to know that it cannot be tolerated—that it is the enemy of freedom, enlightenment, prosperity, and civility. Fundamental Islam is murderous and treasonous; it inspires, instigates, and rewards terrorism. As such, Islam exists outside the protections of the First Amendment.

The phenomenon of Saudi hate ideology is worldwide, but its occurrence in the United States has received scant attention. This report begins to probe in detail the content of the Wahhabi ideology that the Saudi government has worked to propagate through books and other publications within our borders. While substantial analysis has been previously published on Saudi Wahhabism in other countries, few specifics have been reported on the content of Wahhabi indoctrination within the United States. Part of the reason may be that the vast majority of the written materials are in Arabic. Also, U.S. security investigations have focused on stopping money flows and curbing the activities of individual extremists resulting in, among other actions, the recent expulsions of dozens of religious teachers with Saudi diplomatic passports. We have ascertained that as of December 2004, Saudi-connected resources and publications on extremist ideology remain common reading and educational material in some of America’s main mosques.

Wahhab wasn’t the least bit inventive. He wasn’t even a reformer. He was just a good Muslim who based his Islam on the Islamic scriptures—the Qur’an, Sira, Ta’rikh, and Hadith. Wahhab was to Muhammad as Lenin was to Marx. Nothing Wahhab said, nothing the Saudi’s wrote, differs from Muhammad’s words and deeds as they were reported in the books that comprise Islam. Without understanding the consequence, FH admitted as much in their report when they combined these terms: “Wahhabi or salafi interpretations of Islam.”

The “salafs” are Islam’s founding fathers. Without their oral testimony, Muhammad, Allah, Islam, the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sunnah (Muhammad’s example), would be completely unknown. While their words and deeds were the antithesis of Christ’s Disciples, they were Islam’s equivalent. The Concise Encyclopedia of Islam says of the salaf: “They were the first generations of Muslims, considered by later generations to be the most authoritative source for Islamic practice and guidance. The salaf were the Companions of the Prophet. The Wahhabis do not accord a special validity to the opinions and practices introduced after that generation, seeing them as unwarranted innovations.”

While Islam is wrong, the Wahhabis are right. If Muhammad, Islam’s lone founder and prophet, Allah’s singular conduit, got Islam wrong, then Islam is wrong. Only a fool would build a new structure on a faulty foundation of sand. To revise or moderate man’s most deceitful, destructive and deadly dogma, rather than expose and reject it, is the folly of fools.

The analysis of methodology which follows is both sound and important. However, when you recognize that GWB and his father revel in their relationship with the Fahd family, and have compromised America’s security to protect and advance their alliance with evil, it should send shivers up and down your spine. Crown Prince Abdullah, the dictator in charge of Saudi Arabia, was GWB’s first Crawford Ranch guest following the Saudi Arabian dominated 9/11 suicide bombings. Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi Ambassador, learned of GWB’s planed invasion of Iraq during the time the president was denying his intentions to his own people. In fact, Prince Bandar was invited into the White House Situation Room—a place labeled off limits to all foreign nationals. When the initial Pentagon and Congressional reports came out linking the Saudi Arabian government, and thus the Fahd Crown Princes, to 9/11, GWB blocked the release of their reports. It makes you wonder whose side he’s on.

In order to document Saudi influence, the material for this report was gathered from a selection of more than a dozen mosques and Islamic centers in American cities, including Los Angeles, Oakland, Dallas, Houston, Chicago, Washington, and New York. In most cases, these sources are the most prominent and well-established mosques in their areas. They have libraries and publication racks for mosque-goers. Some have full-or part-time schools and, as the 9/11 Commission Report observed, such “Saudi-funded Wahhabi schools are often the only Islamic schools.”

The material collected consists of over 200 books and other publications, many of which titles were available in several mosques. Some 90 percent of the publications are in Arabic, though some are in English. With one exception, the materials for this study were in Arabic and English. The Center had two independent translators review each Arabic document.

All the documents analyzed here have some connection to the government of Saudi Arabia. In some instances, they have five connections. The publications under study each have at least two of the following links to Saudi Arabia. They are:

• official publications of a government ministry;
• distributed by the Saudi embassy;
• comprised of religious pronouncements and commentary by authorities appointed to positions by the Saudi crown;
• representative of the established Wahhabi ideology of Saudi Arabia; and/or
• disseminated through a mosque or center supported by the Saudi crown.

In many examples, the Saudi link is readily apparent from the seal or name appearing on the cover of the publications of the Saudi Embassy in Washington, or of the Saudi cultural, educational or religious affairs ministries, or of the Saudi Air Force.

Some of the mosques and centers, such as the King Fahd Mosque in Los Angeles and the Islamic Center in Washington, are openly acknowledged to receive official support by the Saudi king as recorded on his website. While some observers distinguish between funding from the Saudi state and donations made by individual members of the Saudi royal family, it should be noted that King Fahd makes no such distinction. His website asserts, “King Fahd gave his support, either personally or through his Government.” The website also asserts that “the cost of King Fahd’s efforts in this field has been astronomical, amounting to many billions of Saudi Riyals,” resulting in “some 210 Centers wholly or partly financed by Saudi Arabia, more than 1,500 Mosques and 202 colleges and almost 2,000 schools for educating Muslim children.”

Furthermore, the Saudi government has directly staffed some of these institutions. The King Fahd mosque, the main mosque in Los Angeles, from which several of these publications were gathered, employed an imam, Fahad al Thumairy, who was an accredited diplomat of the Saudi Arabian consulate from 1996 until 2003, when he was barred from reentering the United States because of terrorist connections. The 9/11 Commission Report describes the imam as a “well-known figure at the King Fahd mosque and within the Los Angeles Muslim community,” who was reputed to be an “Islamic fundamentalist and a strict adherent to orthodox Wahhabi doctrine” and observed that he “may have played a role in helping the [9/11] hijackers establish themselves on their arrival in Los Angeles.”

Several hate-filled publications in this study were also gathered from the Institute of Islamic and Arabic Sciences in Fairfax, Virginia. According to investigative reports in the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi Ambassador to the U.S., served as chairman of this school’s Board of Trustees, and some 16 other personnel there held Saudi diplomatic visas until they were expelled for extremism by the State Department in 2004. Until late 2003, the institute was an official adjunct campus of the Imam Mohammed Ibn-Saud Islamic University in Riyadh, part of Saudi Arabia’s state-run university system, funded and controlled by the Saudi Ministry of Education. Although Saudi Arabia claims to have severed official links with it, the Institute the Saudis established continues to operate in northern Virginia.

Some of the works were published by the Al-Haramain Foundation, run from Saudi Arabia with branch offices in the United States until the FBI blocked its assets in February 2004, finding that it was directly funding al Qaeda. In October 2004, the Saudi government’s Ministry for Islamic Affairs dissolved the foundation, and, according to a senior Saudi official, its assets will be folded into a new Saudi National Commission for Charitable Work Abroad.

Some of the Wahhabi materials in this study were printed by publishers and libraries functioning as publishing houses in Saudi Arabia. Some of these are directly government-supported and-controlled, such as the King Fahd National Library. Others are monitored closely by the state, which does not grant the free right to expression, and, according to the State Department, the government’s Ministry of Information has the authority to appoint and remove all editors.

A prolific source of fatwas condemning “infidels” in this collection was Sheik ‘Abd al-‘Aziz Bin ‘Abdillah Bin Baz (died 1999), who was appointed by King Fahd in 1993 to the official post of Grand Mufti. As Grand Mufti, he was upheld by the government of Saudi Arabia as its highest religious authority. Bin Baz was a government appointee who received a regular government salary, served at the pleasure of the King and presided over the Saudi Permanent Committee for Scientific Research and the Issuing of Fatwas, an office of the Saudi government. His radically dichotomous mode of thinking, coupled with his persistent demonizing of non-Muslims and tolerant Muslims, runs through the fatwas in these publications.

Bin Baz is famously remembered by many Saudis for a ruling he issued in 1966 declaring the world flat. He was also responsible for the fatwa, unique in Islam, barring Saudi women from driving. In subsequent years Bin Baz seemed to go out of his way to pronounce against Christians, Jews, and “infidel” Westerners. His fatwas, which carry considerable weight, have been circulated through official Saudi diplomatic channels to mosques and schools throughout the world, including some in the United States, and have been particularly influential in radicalizing Muslim youth at home and abroad. The extremist views proclaimed in these official fatwas belie what Adel al-Jubeir, the articulate Saudi spokesman and special advisor to Crown Prince Abdullah, asserts during televised press conferences about fanatical sheiks in the Kingdom being mainly “underground,” and the fatwas they issue being merely expressions of “their personal opinions.” Though Bin Baz is now dead, his fanatical fatwas continue to be treated as authoritative by the Saudi government.

The bulk of the material was collected in November and December 2003. In December 2004, additional samples were collected from mosques in Washington, Falls Church, Los Angeles, Orange County and Chicago showing that the problem continues as this report goes to press. One of the documents from Saudi Arabia’s Islamic Affairs Ministry bears the post-9/11 publication date of 2002, while most of the other titles were published in the 1980s and 1990s. Notwithstanding the fact that some of the titles were published by groups and entities that in the last two years have been shut down or have broken ties with the Saudi government following U.S. government terrorism investigations, and despite the Saudi government advertising campaign that their textbooks are being revised, the offensive titles and similar publications remain widely available in America, and in some cases dominate mosque library shelves, and continue to be used to educate American Muslims.

Copies of the documents and their translations are kept on file at Freedom House. A listing of the mosques and centers where these publications were found and a bibliography of the documents analyzed in this report follow.

The Foreword which follows contains some interesting insights into the conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims hat we are witnessing in Iraq and it provides some rather useful historical context which most Americans are unaware.

R. James Woolsey

(This foreword is adapted from testimony delivered on May 22, 2002, before the House Committee on International Relations Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia.)

Since the Saudi conquest of the Hejaz [Central Arabia] from the Hashemites [The Hashashen were Islam’s first suicide martyrs. Using hashish to drug their militants, the Hashashen ultimately controlled most of the Middle East.] in 1924 and the formal establishment of the state of Saudi Arabia in 1932 [a gift from Great Britain following the defeat of the Ottoman Turks in WWI] – more or less simultaneously with the discovery of huge oil deposits in the kingdom – Saudi Arabia has been of substantial importance in the world. So although the Saudis have existed as a tribe and a family in control of a small portion of Arabia for centuries, their influence, even their existence as a nation, has come about within the life span of many now living, including the kingdom’s effective ruler today, Crown Prince Abdullah.

Until less than thirty years ago, our relations with the Saudis were generally smooth. We were on the same side in the cold war, and the Saudis valued our support (and we theirs) against Soviet influence in the Mideast. Of course the oil embargo of 1973 created major stress, but the watershed year was 1979, when Khomeini came to power in Iran and extremists took over the holiest of Islam’s shrines, the Mosque in Mecca, which was under the protection of the Saudi King; it was reclaimed by the Saudis only after substantial loss of both life and face.

The Saudis chose after the twin shocks of that year to strike a Faustian bargain with the Wahhabi sect and not only to accommodate their views about propriety, pious behavior, and Islamic law, but effectively to turn over education in the Kingdom to them and later to fund the expansion into Pakistan and elsewhere of their extreme, hostile, anti-modern, and anti-infidel form of Islam. The other side of the bargain was that if the Wahhabis would concentrate their attacks on, essentially, the U.S. and Israel, the Saudi elite would get a more-or-less free ride from the Wahhabis and the corruption within the Kingdom would be overlooked.

Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab (1703-1792) was a disciple of Ibn Taymiyah, a Syrian born Sunni Muslim who fought Muslim Mongols. Taymiyah in turn was influenced by el-Kharij (of which Osama bin Laden is a devotee). The Kharij, meaning “Ones Who Goes Out,” were the first to follow in the footsteps of Muhammad. They were fundamentalist Muslims and terrorists. While Islamic terrorism is the legacy of Muhammad, el-Kharij established the model that all Islamic terrorist groups emulate today. They forced Muslims to obey the Qur’an’s teachings on Jihad and sent countless Islamic youth out on assassination missions to kill Muslims and non-Muslims alike. If they did not fight, they labeled the Muslim youth hypocrites and murdered them in accordance with Allah’s instructions.

El-Kharij, like Muhammad before them, were terrorists—willing to brutalize and plunder any civilian center in their path. Like their prophet, they were slave traders, rapists, womanizers, sexists, and thieves. They are credited with reinforcing Muhammad’s teachings on the value of deception, dishonesty, and political assassination.

Taymiyah studied both Muhammad and el-Kharij. He taught that Mongolian Muslims were not true Muslims, and thus should not be allowed to rule. Taymiyah, not Wahhab, wrote the words which resonate in Saudi Arabia today: “Any Muslim who submits to the authority of a moderate Muslim, helps them or deals with them, becomes one of them—an infidel—and must be killed.” Taymiyah’s guiding principles were: “Muslims should resist, fight and overturn any Islamic government that doesn’t govern in strict compliance with Islamic law and that Muslims were compelled by Allah to wage Jihad on anyone whose beliefs differed from Islam—especially Christians and Jews.” As a result, Taymiayah and his followers declared that the Mongol Muslims were hypocrites and apostates. They attacked them viciously. With each blow they echoed Muhammad’s no tolerance policy for pacifists that reverberates throughout the Medina surahs of the Qur’an.

Muhammad al-Wahhab applied Muhammad’s, the Kharij’s, and Taymiyah’s strategy to overturn the Turkish government, establishing an Islamic state in what would eventually become Saudi Arabia. While he was an effective warrior, Wahhab was not a religious reformer or interpreter.

As a result, this Wahhabi sect, which would have been regarded as recently as fifty years ago as an austere, fringe group by a large majority of Muslims, is now extremely powerful and influential in the Muslim world due to Saudi government support and the oil wealth of the Arabian peninsula. Former Secretary of State George Shultz, not known for either a propensity for overstatement or for hostility to the Saudis, calls this deflection of Wahhabi anger toward us ‘a grotesque protection racket.’

This presentation of Wahhab as a sect of Islam, rather than fundamental Islam, is both erroneous and dangerous. By any rational definition, fundamentalists cannot be a fringe group. Moreover, every poll taken of Muslims living in the Middle East shows that fundamentalist Islamic groups like al-Qaeda, are viewed favorably by 70% to 95% of Muslims.

This Faustian bargain has had a huge effect on opinion in the Kingdom. Bernard Lewis points out that throughout most of the history of Islam in most parts of the Muslim world, Muslims have generally been more tolerant than many other religions – Jews and Christians, as "People of the Book", were dealt with especially tolerantly. Today in the Kingdom, however, young people are systematically infused with hostility for “infidels.”

Bernard Lewis wrote favorably of Muslims only because he despises Christians. To quote Lewis as an authority on Islamic behavior is embarrassing. But more importantly, throughout most of the history of Islam and in most parts of the Muslim world, Muslims were intolerant of all other religions, especially Christianity and Judaism. Muslims were intolerant because the Qur’an orders them to enslave, tax, kidnap, mutilate, and murder all infidels and unbelievers—terms the Qur’an defines as “Christians” in the 5th surah. And Muhammad said, “Kill every Jew” in the Sira, Ta’rikh and Hadith.

Moreover, most young Saudis are not equipped when they graduate from school to perform the jobs necessary to operate a modern economy. Instead many are employed, if that is the right word, as, e.g., religious police – walking the streets to harass women whose veils may not fully cover their faces, for example. Young Saudis’ anger based on their lack of useful work and their indoctrination is palpable. It is not an accident that 15 of the 19 terrorists who attacked us on September 11 were Saudis. The New York Times (January 27, 2002) cited a poll conducted by Saudi Intelligence, and shared with the U.S. government, that over 95% of Saudis between the ages of 25 and 41 have sympathy for Osama bin Laden. Whether this report from the Saudi government of their young adults’ views is accurate or distorted, it makes an important point about hostility to us, either by the government, the people, or both.

The Saudi-funded, Wahhabi-operated export of hatred for us reaches around the globe. It is well known that the religious schools of Pakistan that educated a large share of the Taliban and al Qaeda are Wahhabi.

No, they are Islamic. The Pakistanis are far more likely to read Q’tub (an Egyptian) and Taymiyah (a Syrian), than Wahhab, and they will invest 1,000 hours in the Qur’an and Hadith for every 1 focused on more modern commentators.

But Pakistan is not the sole target. I had in my office recently a moderate Muslim leader from an Asian country. He was in the U.S., seeking to obtain funds from foundations, so that he could have printed elementary school textbooks to compete with the Wahhabi-funded textbooks that are flooding his country and that are being made available to schools at little or no cost. The Wahhabi textbooks in his country, like textbooks in Saudi Arabia, teach that it is the obligation of all Muslims to consider all infidels the enemy.

America’s State Department did fund the production of Islamic textbooks for Malaysia—spending Christian taxpayer money on books that reminded Muslims that they are to “wipe the Christians out to the last.” And they must have worked. Malaysian Muslims have murdered 300,000 Christians in East Timor over the last 20 years.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Americans are not normally comfortable distinguishing between what is acceptable and what is not acceptable within a religion, unless they are, say, debating views within their own church. Because of the First Amendment and American culture, most Americans tend not to make judgments about others’ religions. But the Wahhabis and the Islamists whom they work with and support have a long political reach and their views have substantial political effect. Some of the consequences of this ‘grotesque protection racket’ have been quite lethal: American deaths and the failure to apprehend the terrorists who killed them.

And I dare say, the former C.I.A. Director is aiding and abetting our ignorance of this lethal foe by errantly saying that Islam is peaceful and tolerant while only the “Wahhabis and the Islamists whom they work with and support them” are violent and murderous. Moreover, Islam has always been more political than religious. Muhammad was a warlord and pirate, not a prophet. Americans have been led to believe that Islam is just a religion and thus must be tolerated. If it were correctly view as a political doctrine that advocates the overthrow of all non-Islamic governments, we would be in a better position to prevail against it.

One analogue for Wahhabism’s political influence today might be the extremely angry form taken by much of German nationalism in the period after WW I. Not all angry and extreme German nationalists (or their sympathizers in the U.S.) in that period were or became Nazis. But just as angry and extreme German nationalism of that period was the soil in which Nazism grew, Wahhabi and Islamist extremism today is the soil in which al Qaeda and its sister terrorist organizations are growing. We need to recognize the problem posed by the international spread of this hate ideology, including within the American homeland.

Actually the most accurate correlation is between Islam and Nazism, not between Arabs and Arians. I dedicated 75 pages of Prophet of Doom to a side by side comparison between Hitler’s Mein Kampf and Muhammad’s Qur’an and Hadith. Apart from time and place, they are indistinguishable. These juxtapositions can be found in the following chapters: Demented Deity, Mein Kampf, Islam’s Holocaust, Blood & Booty, and Profitable Prophet Plan. Please read them now.

This report is a first step in an effort to contain the destructive ideology being proliferated by the Wahhabis within the American homeland. Hopefully it will lead to the removal of tracts spreading hatred within American mosques, libraries and Islamic centers. The publications analyzed in this Report and others like them that advocate an ideology of hatred have no place in a nation founded on religious freedom and toleration.

I think it is better to expose, repudiate and ban organizations whose constitution and founders commands the murder of millions, incites terrorism, and treasonously calls the overthrow of all non-Islamic governments. Our former C.I.A. director wants to rearrange their reading material. So were do you stand? Do you have an informed opinion? Have you read Tea With Terrorists and Prophet of Doom? Are you aware of who the terrorists really are and why they kill? Do you know how to stop them?

But I have to give the Director credit for one thing. While he has misidentified the enemy, he has correctly surmised that Islam “has no place in a nation founded on…freedom.


Tuesday, May 02, 2006

قصة الاسلام الحقيقية التى يحاول المسلمون التغطية عليها منذ بداية الحركة المحمدية

كلنا يعلم البداية المخزية لقصة ولادة محمد بن آمنة وانه جاء من علاقة غير شريفة قامت بها آمنة قبل مولد محمد رسول الاسلام بدليل القصة الملفقة حول الحمل به اربع سنوات والنور الذى فج من فرجها عند ولادته وغطى على المنطقة من مكة الى قصور بصرى والشام .. يرجى مراجعة المراجع المذكورة ادناه لمعرفة ان محمد ابن زنا ..

من المنطقى ان ابن الزنا يعيش حياته منبوذا فى المجتمع الذى ولد فيه خصوصا عندما يكون المجتمع صغيرا، والكل يعرف الكل فيه، اصلا، وفصلا، ونسبا، وصهرا الخ .. وبالتالى من المنطقى ان يعيش محمد فترة طفولته وصباه فى فقر مدقع .. وان يحاول التمسكن على من يملكون المال والجاه ليعمل لديهم او لديهن حتى يتمكن من العيش.. وهذا ماكان من امر محمد بن آمنه ..

فقد وجد امرأة غنية اسمها خديجة ذات حسب ونسب (قريبها ورقة بن نوفل وهو المطرود من المسيحية نتيجة خزعبلاته وهرطقاته)، ولها من التجارة والمال الشئ الكثير .. وبرغم عدم تكافوء المركزين الاجتماعيين بينه وبينها من حيث :
السن : كان عمره حوالى 21 سنة وكان عمرها قد تخطى الاربعين عاما اى ضعف عمره تقريبا.
المركز الاجتماعى: كان ابن زنا، فقيرا منبوذا لا يجد قوت يومه وكانت ذات حسب ونسب وغنية غنى فاحش .
اسبقية الزواج: لم يسبق له الزواج بالطبع، فمن اين له ان يتقدم للزواج ومن كانت سترضى بمثل هذا الزوج , وهى سبق لها الزواج مرتين فهى امرأة مجربة .

نفهم من كل هذا انه برغم عدم التكافوء هذا ، فقد عطفت عليه خديجة ووظفته لديها لينضف تحت البعير وينقل البضائع من هنا وهناك الخ كعامل نظافة .. واثبت كفاءة , وفكر فى ان يلعب لعبة الحب والزواج على هذه الارملة الطروب كما هى العادة فى مثل هذه الاحوال .. وقد كان ..فلو نظرت من وجهة نظره ستجد انه سيعيش على حساب المدام ويتحكم فى مالها وتجارتها ويصبح شيخ بندر التجار باسم المدام .. ومن وجهة نظرها فهو شاب فى عز شبابه مملوء حيوية ونشاط وفى نفس الوقت هى المتحكمة فيه بحيث لا يمكنه اللعب بديله والنظر الى امرأه اخرى.. ونجد هنا مفارقة اخرى .. انهما بهذا الاتفاق التآمرى .. جعلا ابو خديجة يسكر حتى الثمالة ليجدهما فى الصباح معا فى سرير واحد ويوهماه بانه وافق على هذه الزيجة التى يعترض عليها .. وامام الامر الواقع استمر الحال .. وكما يظهر من هذا الذى تم عرضه ، فان محمدا كان انتهازيا وصوليا افاقا..

استمرت العلاقة الزوجية بين محمد وخديجة خمسة وعشرون عاما كاملة .. مليئة بالمفارقات العجيبة .. طوال هذه الفترة الطويلة لم يتجرأ اله الاسلام المزعوم على ان ينزل آية واحدة تبيح لمحمد الزواج او حتى النظر الى امرأة اخرى فى حياة خديجة .. وبمجرد موتها بدأت الايات المؤلفة والمطبوخة طبخا جيدا، والمفصلة حسب الظروف والاحوال والاشخاص والاهواء(سنعرض فى آخر هذا البحث نماذجا من أسباب مايطلق عليه نزول آيات) ، تنهمر على رأس محمد تبيح له النكاح مثنى وثلاث ورباع وما ملكت ايمانه .. كما سنجد ان الهلوسات التى كانت تجيئه ويفسرها علماء علم النفس بانها نوبات صرع او ما شابه .. كانت خديجة بصفتها أمرأة مجربة تجعل محمد يضع رأسه على فخذها اليمين ثم فخذها الشمال ثم على ما بينهما وهى (هى ) التى تؤكد له ان هذه وحى يوحى .. كما سنجد انه بعد ان تخمرت فكره الوحى الذى يوحى فى راسه العفن وصدق هذا الايحاء، اخذ يغنى على اهل مكه اللذين يعرفون اصله وفصله جيدا وكانوا يسخرون منه ومن خزعبلاته التى ساعده عليها ورقه بن نوفل وبحيره ..واستمر هذا الحال من سنة 610 ميلادية الى سنة 622 ميلادية اى حوالى اثنى عشر عاما ، واخيرا عندما زهقوا منه طردوه وجماعته الى يثرب (المدينة)، وهناك اظهر الوجه الحقيقى للحركة المحمدية .. رئيس عصابة من قطاع الطرق .. شكل وكون هذه العصابة باموال امرأته الغنية ومن مجموعة من الشحاذين آكلى الصدقة ومن قطاع الطرق المعروفين .. يرجى مراجعة المراجع المذكورة فى آخر هذا البحث للتأكد من هذه الحقائق الدامغة ...

بدأ محمد وعصابته فى السطو على القوافل المارة حتى ازداد غنى وقوة وكبرت عصابته باستخدام جميع الوسائل الممكنة فى ذلك الوقت من شراء الذمم والترغيب والترهيب..كما ازداد اعداءه ضعفا من الناحية المادية .. كما استولى على آبار المياه وهى كما نعلم المصدر الرئيسى للحياة بالنسبة للقوافل والقبائل .. مما شجعه وعصابته على مهاجمة القبائل وقتل رجالها واخذ نساءها واطفالها واموالهم سبايا وغنائم ، حيث كان يوزع اربعة اخماس الغنائم على صحابته واعضاء عصابته وخمس تلك الغنائم كان له مدعيا انه لله ورسوله ولم يذكر لنا اى مرجع كيف كان محمدا يوزع الخمس بينه وبين الهه .

ثم ازدادت سطوة محمد وعصابته من خلال الغزوات والفتوحات والسطو حتى تجرأ اكثر واخذ فى مهاجمة الشعوب المحيطة بجزيرة العرب.

يلاحظ ان محمد ارتكب جريمة تصنف فى القانون الدولى بأنها جريمة ضد الانسانية وهى معروفة باسم جريمة تطهير عرقى عندما قضى على غالبية اليهود والنصارى اللذين كانوا متواجدين فى مكة والمدينة فى الفترة قبل واثناء وجود محمد. وطبقا للقانون الدولى ، فان هذه الجريمة لا تسقط بالتقادم مهما مر عليها من زمن .. أى انه من حق يهود اليوم ومسيحيى اليوم ان يحاكموا محمدا وخلفاؤه أمام محكمة عدل دولية كما فعل المجتمع الدولى مع ميلوسفتش حاكم يوغوسلافيا السابق .. كما ان نفس القانون يعطى الحق ليهودى اليوم ومسيحيى اليوم ان يطالبوا بالتعويضات المادية المناسبة عما تم فى حقهم من اجرام محمد منذ ذلك التاريخ مع الفوائد القانونية المتراكمة وحتى تاريخ السداد.

كما نلاحظ ان اليهود والنصارى اللذين تمكنوا من الفرار هربا بارواحهم وتركوا وراءهم ممتلكاتهم، تفرقوا فى العالم القديم (آسيا – افريقيا – اوروبا).. ولم ينسوا جذورهم مطلقا.. ولم ينسى الاجداد ان يبلغوا ابناءهم واحفادهم عما تم فى حقهم من اجرام محمدى اسلامى على مدار التاريخ منذ اليوم الاول لهذه الجرائم..وعندما آن الاوان للبعض ان يرجع، اخذ المسلمون الذين سكنوا واحتلوا مكان الاصليين فى الولولة قائلين ان اليهود والنصارى العائدين هم اجانب يريدون احتلال هذه الاراضى (هم اصحاب الارض الاصليين ولكن الادعاءات الاسلامية لا ترى الحقائق وتريد تحريفها كالعادة المحمدية الاسلامية).وهو الامر الذى يجعل المسلمين يدورون فى حلقة مفرغة من الوهم الزائف وانكار الحقائق الدامغة من واقع المستندات الاسلامية البحته وعلى رأسها قرآنهم واحاديثهم، ولكنه العمى الحيثى وعمى البصيرة.. وسيظلوا يدورون فى نفس الحلقة المفرغة الى ان يعترفوا بالحقائق ويعيدوا الحقوق لاصحابها والا فان الثمن سيكون غاليا جدا ..
فى الاسلام تشوف الغلط وتصر على الغلط
in islam .. you see the wrongs and insist on the wrongs

المراجع :
-كتب السيرة النبويةأقدم الكتب التي دَوِّنت تفاصيل جمع القرآن هي التراجيم الثلاثة المعروفة بكتب السيرة النبوية-سيرة رسول الله لمحمد بن إسحاق (اعتمد عليه بن هشام في تأليف كتاب السيرة النبوية)-كتاب الطبقات الكبير لمحمد بن سعد-كتاب المغازي لمحمد بن عمر الواقدي

-كتب الحديث
-صحيح البخاري لمحمد بن اسماعيل البخاري-صحيح مسلم لمسلم بن الحجاج-سنن بن أبي داوود لسليمان بن أبي داوود-الجامع الصحيح لأبي عيسى محمد الترمذي-الموطأ لمالك بن أنس-السنن الكبرى لأبي بكر أحمد البيهقي
-كتب التفسير
لا علاقة مباشرة لهما بالتفسير القرآني :-كتاب المصاحف لابن أبي داوود-الإتقان في علوم القرآن لجلال الدين السُيوطي

مواقع على الانترنت يمكن مراجعتها وامام كل منها ما يعطى فكرة عن مضمون محتوياته: محمد رسول الإسلام ابن زناMohaed was impastor.. the story of his birth ..4 years pregnancy

هتك عرض الرسول أما ابن عمي فهتك عرضي ، وأما ابن عمتي وصهري فهو الذي قال في بمكة ما قالMohamed has been raped by one of his cousins and another insulted him and denies his allegations while been in mecca ..
وأسلم الناس من خوف السيف the people accepted islam for fear of the sword ..) ‏أن رسول الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏لا تبدءوا ‏ ‏اليهود ‏ ‏والنصارى ‏ ‏بالسلام وإذا لقيتم أحدهم في الطريق فاضطروهم إلى أضيقه أن رسول الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏أمرت أن أقاتل الناس حتى ‏ ‏يشهدوا ‏ ‏أن لا إله إلا الله وأن ‏ ‏محمدا ‏ ‏رسول الله ويقيموا الصلاة ويؤتوا الزكاة فإذا فعلوا ذلك ‏ ‏عصموا ‏ ‏مني دماءهم وأموالهم إلا بحق الإسلام وحسابهم على الله mohamed was a criminal & a gangester محمد رئيس عصابة من قطاع الطرق,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8&Offset=60&SearchLevel=QBE بعثت بالسيف و جعلت رزقى تحت ظل رمحى I have been sent by the sword and my living is under the edge of it ونصرت بالرعب وأحلت لي الغنائم ( معين من الله قاطع طريق I have been made victorious by terror and the booty became mine... a gangester mohamed was .. ‏فقتل رجالهم وقسم نساءهم وأولادهم وأموالهم بين المسلمين he killed their men, and divided their women and kids alongwith the properties on the moslems نبى الرحمة القذر قطع ايديهم وارجلهم. وسمر عيونهم بمسامير the filthy merciful ‘prophet’ cutted the hands and the legs and nailed their eyes with nails فَقَتَلَهُ وَهْوَ نَائِم(الشجاعة الاسلامية فى ابهى صورها he couldn’t face the man .. so he waited till he was sleeping and sent a bunch of his followers and killed him while sleeping .. how brave ..محمد يشق أم قرفة بين جملين mohamed ties the right leg in one camel and the left leg in another camel and makes them run in opposite directions to cut the 84 years old lady who wrote some poetry which he didn't like.. after killing her in this most torturing way, he cutted her head and fixed it on a javeline to increase the degree of horror اقرا محمد يقتل زوج امرأه ووالدها ويدخل بها فى نفس اليوم ويحرسه احد الصحابه خوفا عليه منها،لم يحترم مشاعرها حزنا على القتلى من اهلها، ولم يحترم اى نوع من الشرائع من ناحية ابراء الرحم ودخل بها فى نفس الليلة .. اقذر من القذارة هذا المعفن الصايع ابن آمنه الصايعة (الفاظ محمد رسول الاسلام الشوارعى الصايع the messenger of islam is using the most filthy street words .. the f word الرسول يشرب النبيذ والعياذُ بالله mohamed used to drink wine محمد توضـا بالخمر
تفسير القرطبي الاسلام يعذب المرأة المرتدة يدخلون خاذوق حديد من فرجها يخرج من فمها سورة النحل 106 mohamed promises his followers the paradis even if they commit adultery or steal ان سرق وان زنا يارسول الله ؟ الزبالة المعفن الواطى اخلاق رسول الاسلامall about the filthy messenger of islam احاديث محمدية وسخة زى محمد
ما من جهة مفاخذة رسول الله لخطيبته عائشة فقد كانت في سن السادسة من عمرها ولا يستطيع ان يجامعها لصغر سنها لذلك كان يضع اربه بين فخذيها ويدلكه دلكا خفيفا. شوفوا الكذب والتدليس والنصب والخداع الاسلامى .. الحق على الكفرة .. مش على محمد اقذر واوطى واحقر خلق الله اللى عمل البلاوى كلها قبل ظهور الافلام الخليعة يَا فى ليلتى وعلى فراشى يا رسول الله ؟؟

رضاع الكبير لا بأس به أن يكون مباشراً من ثدي المرأة المسلمة للرجل المسلم كما قال الألباني بناء على السنة المحمدية (الرابط في الأنترنت :
قال ‏ ‏خير الناس للناس تأتون بهم في السلاسل في أعناقهم حتى يدخلوا في الإسلام صحيح البخاري تفسير القرآن كنتم خير أمة أخرجت للناس

ولاء المسلم للوهابية السعودية المحمدية وليس لوطنة الام .. بمعنى ان المسلم المصرى ولاءه ليس لمصر.. بل للشيطان المحمدى المتوطن فى الكعبة ..
The loyality of the Moslems is always for the mohamedans wahabies of saudia arabia.. never to their home countries.. i.e. the Egyptian moslem’s loyality is not for Egypt but to the satan residing in kaaba..

المسلم يقبل الاحتلال والمهانة والاذلال من اخوه المسلم بحكم الشريعة الاسلامية والتعاليم القرآنية.. ومستعد ان يفجر نفسه لاغراض تاخذ الشكل الدينى وهى كلها سياسة كما يحدث من الفلسطينيين وكل المتربعين على الكراسى .. ولم نسمع او نرى مسلما واحدا تظاهر للمطالبة بحقوق المواطنية من معاملةجيدة وشفافية فى الحكم .. بل يخرج للتظاهر من اجل شوية مرتذقة فلسطينيين او عراقيين لمجرد انهم مسلمين

The Moslem accepts occupation and humiliation from his ‘brother’ Moslem as per the filthy Islamic sharia and the filthy koranic teachings.. he is ready and prepared to explode himself for purposes taking the shape of a religion while it is all politics… we never seen nor heard any Moslem demonstrating to demand citizen human rights and transparency… but we have seen them demonstrating to support some mafia of philistine and irak just because they are Moslems..!!!!

المسلم الجاهل يعتدى على الاخرين باسم الاسلام والقرآن، وباسم محمد زبالة البشرية، لانه لا يعلم حقيقة محمد وقرآن محمد واسلام محمد ..
The ignorant Moslems attack and insult the non Moslems in the name of their filthy islam and filthy Koran and filthy Mohamed the garbage of humanity because they don’t know the reality of their filthy islam

مصر بلد الاقباط اللى بيحبوها ويضحوا علشانها بحياتهم .. المسلم اللى مش عاجبه الكلام ده يروح عند حبيبه الشيطان المحمدى ويفضل يرجم فيه براحته .. حللوا عن بلدنا يا كفرة يا محمديين يا تقعدوا باحترامكم ياكلاب البشرية واوسخ خلق الله زى محمدكم
Egypt is the country of the copts .. the copts are prepared to sacrifice their lives to protect it…. The Moslem who doesn’t like this, can go back to Arabia where he can find his satanic Mohamed buried and may start stoning him for the rest of his life ..

المسلمون فى مصر يبنون مساجدهم بالقرب من الكنائس حتى يتم التحريض الشيطانى بسهولة ويخرج المصلون المسلمون وهم معبأون طازة للتهجم والتخريب.. كما حدث فى الاسكندرية وغيرها ..
The Moslems of Egypt build their mosques adjacent to the churches in order to make it easy for the idiots of islam to come out from their filthy mosques and attack .. latest example what has happened in Alexandria

الشيطان المحمدى الاسلامى يعتقد انه بالتهجم على المسيحيين فى مصر وعلى كنائسهم سيكون له اليد الطولى علما بان كل فعل دنئ وخسيس قام به المسلمون ينعكس بأسوأ النتائج عليهم وعلى اسلامهم وعلى محمدهم.. فهو يكشف الخسة والوضاعة والندالة الاسلامية المحمدية أمام العالم كله ..
The satanic mohamedans think by attacking the Christians of Egypt and the churches, they will have the upper hand… put into consideration that any mean stupid behaviour done by the Moslems turns upon their head and exposes the filth of their islam more before the whole world

قتلكم للمسيحيين لم يعن ولن يعن أن الاسلام صحيح .. بل هو تأكيد على ان الاسلام هو دين شيطانى والمسلمون هم اتباع الشيطان المحمدى ..زيدوا فى غيكم وجهلكم وحقارتكم واكشفوا وساخة الاسلام كمان وكمان ..
Killing the Christians doesn’t mean and never meant that your islam is right nor correct.. in the contrary.. it assures that your islam is satanic all the way through and you Moslems are the followers of the satanic Mohamed … go ahead .. do more of your filthy activities and expose your garbage more and more
لغاية يومنا هذا .. يقوم الكفرة المسلمون بالحج والطواف ورمى الجمرات على الشيطان المتوطن فى الكعبة المحمدية .. هذا رجس من عمل الشيطان المحمدى ولازال مستمرا حتى اليوم فى القرن الواحد والعشرون ..
The infidel moslems perform their pilgrimage to mecca and throw stones on the satan dwelling in their filthy kaaba.. this is still applciable till today's date in the 21st centurey

قال رسول الاسلام الزبالة المعفن،‏ ‏من توكل لي ما بين رجليه وما بين لحييه توكلت له بالجنة عرفت يا مسلم انك لما تنكح محمدك هاتخش الجنة الاسلامية ؟؟ يالا ياعم هيص ..ماحدش قدك

kick all the moslems out of the west .. clean the west from the garbage of islam .. send them back to their paradise .. let us see what they will do that filthy moslems with their koran and their islam اطردوا كل المسلمين من دول الغرب .. نظفوا الغرب من الوساخة الاسلامية .. اشحنوهم الى جنتهم الموعودة دعونا نرى كيف سيتعاملون مع الحقارة الاسلامية والقرآنية المحمدية

يا أمة ضحكت من جهلها الامم.. يا أمة بالت وتبرزت عليها الامم.. يا امة رضعت من صدر امهاتها الامم.. اظهروا الزبالة المحمدية كمان وكمان .. اكشفوا الوساخة الاسلامية المحمدية

Monday, May 01, 2006

The Two Faces of Islam

Written by : Fr. Zakaria Botros
Published By:

After the recent terroristic attacks on America’s World Trade Center and Pentagon, there has been a very clear debate in the international media regarding the nature of Islam. We have seen the media change from the one extreme of being explicitly anti-Islamic, to the other, for the sake of presenting a political and human balance, of being pro-Moslem.

Christianity very clearly teaches us to love all of our fellow humans- even our enemies- but it by no means, tells us to become blind to reality and the truth, or to be mislead by misinformation or by political correctness.

To make a fair assessment regarding any issue, one must be aware of all sides of the matter at hand, and for this reason; this study will demonstrate a certain side of Islam, which has not been precisely portrayed by any part of the popular media. The facts here will be based on textual reality from a recognised interpretation of the Quran [The meaning of THE HOLY QURAN by Abdullah Yusuf Ali1992]- note that the word ‘interpretation’ and not ‘translation’ is used because Islam prohibits the literal ´true´ translation of its ‘holy book’- for this reason, the Arabic text of the Quranic verses has also been included, so that there is no possible accusation of misinterpretation.

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, many Muslims (and non-Muslims driven by political ends) worldwide have attempted to present Islam as a religion of peace and love, wanting to distance it from those shameful and brutal occurrences… they say that there is no violence in the essence of Islam.

It is obvious however that the perpetrators of these acts base their dependence on violence on clear and indisputable verses of the Quran, represented clearly in a statement by Osama Bin Laden on the CNN network. Based on this premise, Bin Laden, the Taliban and the Philippines Muslim group Abu Saiaf, among others, have openly declared war against the United States of America in the name of Islam, using quotations from the Quran such as:

‘And those of the people of the Book (Jews & Christians) who aided them (the unbelievers), Allah (God) did take them down from their strongholds. And cast terror into their hearts, so that some ye slew, and some ye made prisoners. And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods’ (Surah Al Ahzab 33:26 and 27

(سورة الأحزاب آيات 26و27)وأنزل الذين ظاهروهم (إي الذين كفروا) من أهل الكتاب من صياصيهم (حصونهم) وقذف في قلوبهم الرعب فريقا تقتلون وتأسرون فريقا. وأورثكم أرضهم وديارهم وأموالهم وأرضا لم تطأها وكان الله على كل شيء قديرا]

Many are then confused; is Islam a religion of violence, or one of peace?

When we actually study the book of Islam, the Quran, we discover that Islam has two faces. Each of these faces represents a certain stage of Mohammed’s character: one in Mecca, and the other in Medina.

Mohammed’s character in Mecca
(lasted ONLY 12 years at the very beginning of Mohamed´s movement)

In Mecca, where Mohammed started his new movement giving it a name of a ´religion´ in the year 610 A.D, he was not yet strong. To be accepted by all people, he presented a peaceful and loving picture of Islam, avoiding any mention of violence, and here are some quotations from the Quran about that first stage (again note that it remained ONLY 12 years):

1. (true translation)Mohammed was told to be patient with his opponents in Surah Al Muzzammil (73:10) ‘And have patience with what they say, and leave them with noble (dignity)’

+سورة المزمل (73: 10) "واصبر على ما يقولون واهجرهم هجرا جميلا"

2. (true translation) Mohammed was told not to impose Islam by force in Surah Al baqarah (2: 256) ‘Let there be no compulsion in religion’
+سورة البقرة (2: 256) "لا إكراه في الدين"

3. (true translation )Mohammed was told to speak pleasantly to ‘people of the Book’ (Christians and Jews) in Surah Al Ankabut (29:45) ‘And dispute ye not with the people of the Book, except with means better (than mere disputation) … but say: we believe in the Revelation which has come down to us and that which came down to you; Our God and your God is One; and it is to Him we bow (in Islam)’
+ سورة العنكبوت (29: 46) "ولا تجادلوا أهل الكتاب إلا بالتي هي أحسن ... وقولوا آمنا بالذي أنزل إلينا وأنزل إليكم وإلهنا وإلهكم واحد ونحن له مسلمون"

Mohammed’s character in Medina
(prevailing since 622 AD till today´s date)
After Mohammed moved to Medina in the year 622 AD and his followers grew in strength and number, he became a relentless warrior, intent on spreading his religion by the sword, and this is the message that now lives on. Here is some evidence from Quran of this stage:

1. (
true translation) He claimed that God told him to kill his opponents in Surah Al baqarah (2:191) ‘And slay them wherever ye catch them …’
+ سورة البقرة (2: 191) "واقتلوهم حيث ثقفتموهم (وجدتموهم) ..."

(mis leading mis informing interpretation) Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying, “This passage is illustrated by the events that happened at Hudaybiyyah [a battle] in the six year of the Hijrah [exodus of Mohammed from Mecca to Medina]. The Muslims were by this time a strong and influential community”. (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P77).

(true translation) He claimed that God told him to kill whoever rejects Islam in Surah Al Baqara (2:193) ‘And fight them on until there is no tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Alla …’

+ سورة البقرة (2: 193) "وقاتلوهم حتى لا تكون فتنة ويكون الدين لله ..."

(mis leading mis informing interpretation)Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying, “Islam will not acquiesce in wrong doing, and its men will hold their lives cheap in defence of honour,and the religion which they hold sacred. They believe in courage, obedience… and a constant striving by all means in their power… They will not flinch from war if their houner,demands it and a righteous Imam commands it” (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P77).

3. (
true translation) He claimed that God told him to fight the ‘people of the Book’ (Christians & Jews) in Surah Al Tawba (2:29) ‘Fight those who believe not in Alla and the Last Day … nor acknowledge the religion of truth (Islam) from among the People of the Book until they pay the Jizyah (tax) with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued …’

+ سورة التوبة (2: 29) “قاتلوا الذين لا يؤمنون بالله واليوم الآخر ... ولا يدينون دين الحق من الذين أوتوا الكتاب (أي النصارى واليهود) حتى يعطوا الجزية وهم صاغرون ...”
(mis leading mis informing interpretation)Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying, “A straight fight in the cause of right; go forth bravely to strive and struggle, and prove yourselves worthy of Alla”
(The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.446).

4- (true translation)(Surah Al Tawbah 9: 12) “… Fight ye the chiefs of Unfaith [infidel] …”

(سورة التوبة 9: 12) "... فقاتلوا أئمة الكفر إنهم لا أيمان لهم لعلهم ينتهون"

(mis leading mis informing interpretation) Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying,”The catalogue of their sins being set out, it is cleare that they were aggressors in the worst possible ways; and war became inevitable”. (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.440).

5- (
true translation)(Surah Al Tawbah 9: 14) “Fight them and Alla will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you to victory over them, Heal the breasts of Believers”

(سورة التوبة 9: 14) "قاتلوهم يعذبهم الله بأيديكم ويخزهم وينصركم عليهم ويشف صدور قوم مؤمنين"

(mis leading mis informing interpretation) Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying,”When Alla’s Law is stablished, the fire of indignation is quelled, and the true Peace of Islam is attained” (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.441).

6- (
true translation)(Surah Al Tawbah 9: 123) “O ye who believe fight the unbelievers who gird you about. And let them find firmness in you and know that Alla is with those who fear Him”

(سورة التوبة 9: 123) "يا أيها الذين آمنوا قاتلوا الذين يلونكم من الكفار وليجدوا فيكم غلظة واعلموا أن الله مع المتقين"

(mis leading mis informing interpretation) Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying,”When conflict becomes inevitable, the first thing is to clear our surroundings of all evil…To evil we must put up a stout and stif resistance” (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.475).

(true translation)(Sura Al Anfal 8: 65) “O Prophet rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patint and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding”

(سورة الأنفال 8: 65) "يا أيها النبي حرض المؤمنين على القتال إن يكن منكم عشرون صابرون يغلبوا مائتين وإن يكن منكم مائة يغلبوا ألفا من الذين كفروا بأنهم قوم لا يفقهون"

(mis leading mis informing interpretation)Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying, “In a fight … the men of faith do not daunt. Whether they personally win or die, their cause prevails. They are sure to win: because (1) they have divine aid, and (2) even humanly speaking, those who take up arms against truth are fools, and their seeming power is but a broken reed”. (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.431).
He adds,” Jihad (Holy war) is fought under strict conditions laid down by Islam, and glory for the cause of Alla”. (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.431).

8- (
true translation)(Surah Al Baqara 2: 216) “Fighting is prescribed upon you …”
(سورة البقرة 2: 216) "كتب عليكم القتال ..."

(mis leading mis informing interpretation)Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying, “To fight in the cause of truth is one of the highest forms of charity”. (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.86). Notice: Fight is a form of charity, in Islam!!!

(true translation)(Surah Al Anfal 8:60) “Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts) of the enemies of Alla and your enemies …”

(سورة الأنفال 8: 60) "وأعدوا لهم ما استطعتم من قوة ومن رباط الخيل ترهبون به عدو الله وعدوكم ..."
(mis leading mis informing interpretation)Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on this verse saying, “In every fight arm yourself with the best weapons and the best arms against your enemy, so as to instil wholesome respect into him for you and the cause you stand for”. (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P.429).


The problem with the assessment of Islam in the West, which is predominantly Christian, is that it is looked upon as another faith- like Christianity- and thus it is the right of each individual to worship as he or she pleases. This is right, but the problem is that Islam is not like Christianity.

Christianity is a system of faith and morality which can exist within any national or state system, but Islam however has its own political and judicial system embodied in the Shareia (Islamic law) which governs every Muslim. For this reason, Islamic fundamentalists who live even in a moderate Islamic state with a secular political system, will attempt to overthrow this system because it does not sufficiently embody the principals of Islam being ‘Religion and State’.

This study by no means attempts to present a picture of all Muslims being bad, because this is not at all true- there are many moderate Muslims who are good and constructive members of society, but even these are looked upon by fundamentalists as kaffara (apostate) because they do not follow the Quran faithfully, and thus are also worthy of the same end as any non-Muslim, that is, death.

Thus, the problem is one of Islam, and not of Muslims. It is the role of each believer to carry out the teachings of that faith, and thus, these teachings become the rules by which he or she lives- any ‘faithful’ Muslim must follow the Quran.

Islam everywhere in the world especially in the West follow the same ideology and strategy of Islam. They start with the first stage of weakness to pretend that they are peaceful and loving. They take advantage of Democracy, Freedom of Speach and Human Rights in the West to spread their Islam.

After they become strong they do not hesitate to kill people and destroy the civilization of the West, which –according to their belief– is against the doctrines of Islam, as we have seen in bombing the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington (and more recently, in France and most of the European countries after the Cartoon publishing).

Testimonies Of Famous Muslims

1- Mohammed Hassanein Heikal’ a well-known Egyptian Muslim author (former Editor-In-Cheif of the Daily Al Ahram) refers to this fact in his famous book “Autumn Furor”. He said,

“The element of Jihad (holy war) emerged in the ideology of Abul Alaa Almaudoody (a fanatical Muslim in Egypt). He went on to differentiate between two separate stages, a Muslim community goes through:
The stage of weakness – In it a Muslim community is unable to take charge of its own destiny. In this case – according to his thinking – they must withdraw for the purpose of preparing themselves to be capable of executing the second stage.

The second stage is the Jihad (holy war) stage, and it will come when the Islamic Community has completed its preparation and is ready to come out of its isolation to take charge, through Jihad

In this, Abul Alaa Almaudoody was making a comparison between the two stages of weakness and Jihad on the one hand, and on the other hand, Mohammad’s struggle in Mecca, then in Medina.”[Following the same strategy of Mohammed].

2- Hassan Abdulla Al Torabi, the most fanatic Sudanese Muslim leader, was accustomed to say openly, “We pretend to be weak, till we become strong”

3- Imam Abdullah Yusuf Ali, comments on Surah Al baqarah (2:191) ‘And slay them wherever ye catch them…’
“This passage is illustrated by the events that happened at Hudaybiyyah [a battle] in the six year of the Hijrah [exodus of Mohammed from Mecca to Medina]. The Muslims were by this time a strong and influential community”. (The Meaning of the Holy Quran P77).
This is the reality of Islam and his two faces. How much we should be aware of what is happening around us.



What makes a young Muslim strap a high explosive vest on his chest and blow himself to smithereens?

Is it the so-called Israeli "occupation?"
Is it his frustration?
Is it the $25,000 the family receives for Jews successfully murdered? Or is it the Qu'ran [Koran] ... the alleged holy book of Islam!

Years ago, the alleged Prophet Mohammed cleverly devised a devilish scheme to bribe Arabs into committing hideous crimes by promising them materialistic things which they couldn't obtain in the harsh desert. This Paradise contained six important items:
72 beautiful virgins,
4 young gay boys,
fruits and
Mohammed knew that sex would sell very well among the group of his lecherous followers who were motivated to fight battles by the promise of sex slaves and booty. Once the followers got to heaven, they could pleasure themselves with endless sexual encounters with 'Houris' (beautiful young virgins)... 72 virgins girls and 28 young pre-pubescent boys. Mohammed goes one step further and expands the promise of virgins to include a free sex market where there is no limit of the number of sexual partners. Women and young boys are on display as if in a fruit market where you can choose the desired ripeness. Allah is indeed merciful! Relevant verses from the Koran and quotes from the Hadiths:

Koran 78:31
As for the righteous, they shall surely triumph. Theirs shall be gardens andvineyards, and high-bosomed virgins for companions: a truly overflowingcup

Koran 37:40-48
...They will sit with bashful, dark-eyed virgins, as chaste as the shelteredeggs of ostriches.

Koran 44:51-55
...Yes and We shall wed them to dark-eyed houris. (beautiful virgins)

Koran 52:17-20
...They shall recline on couches ranged in rows. To dark-eyed houris(virgins) we shall wed them...

Koran 55:56-57
In them will be bashful virgins neither man nor Jinn will have touchedbefore. Then which of the favors of your Lord will you deny ?"

Koran 55:57-58
Virgins as fair as corals and rubies. Then which of the favors of your Lordwill you deny ?"

Koran 55:70-77
In each there shall be virgins chaste and fair... Dark eyed virginssheltered in their tents whom neither man nor Jin will have touched before..

Koran (AL-WAQI`AH = the battle) 56:7-40
...We created the houris (the beautiful women) and made them virgins, lovingcompanions for those on the right hand..

Homosexuality was and is widely practiced in Islamic countries. To please the homosexuals among his followers he promised them pre-pubescent boys in Paradise. Below are relevant verses from the Koran and quotes from the Hadiths:

Koran 52:24
Round about them will serve, to them, boys (handsome) as pearlswell-guarded.

Koran 56:1
Round about them will serve boys of perpetual freshness.

Koran 52.24
And there shall wait on them [the Muslim men] young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls."

Koran 76.19
They shall be attended by boys graced with eternal youth, who will seem like scattered pearls to the beholders."

One of the major problems in the desert of Arabia was shortage of pure water. Mohammed knew very well that to the Arabians, fresh water was an item of luxury. So promising them abundant pure water, river, fountains and springs in paradise would definitely lure them to murder, loot and plunder people of other religions in this life. Relevant verses from the Koran

Koran 13:35
This is the paradise which the righteous have been promised: it is wateredby running streams..

Koran 3:198
As for those that fear their Lord, theirs shall be gardens watered byrunning streams in which they will abide for ever, and a goodly welcome fromGod...

Koran 3:136
...These shall be rewarded with forgiveness from their Lord and with gardenswatered by running streams, where they shall dwell forever. Blessed is thereward of those who do good works..

Koran 15:45
The righteous (will be) amid gardens and fountains (of clear flowing water)

Koran 22:23
As for those who have faith and who do good work, God will admit them togardens watered by running streams..

Koran 47:15
Here is a Parable Of the Garden which the righteous are promised: In itare rivers of water incorruptible;

Koran 55:50-51
In them each will be two springs flowing free; Then which of the favors ofyour Lord will you deny ?

Koran 55:66-67
In them will be Two Springs pouring forth water in continuous abundance: Thenwhich of the favours of your Lord will you deny ?

Koran 44:51-55
As for the righteous, they shall be lodged in peace together amidst gardensand fountains...

Koran 56:7-40
...They shall recline on couches raised on high in the shade of thornlessLote trees and talhs; amidst gushing water...

Mohammed had to find more selling points besides virgins, young boys and plenty of water. What good would be of Paradise without rivers of wine for his followers? Wine was an extremely precious commodity in the dry deserts of Arabia where it was rare to find vineyards. Mohammed had a problem here- he had to include wine in his 'Paradise-Package' but how could he include it in the list when Allah had declared intoxicants as sinful. The only way to do this was to somehow claim that the wine in the promised Paradise was not intoxicating and therefore not sinful. Relevant verses from the Koran:

Koran 47:15
Here is a Parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised. In itare...rivers of wine...

Koran 37:40-48
But the true servants of God shall be well provided for,...they shall beserved with goblet filled at a gushing fountain, white and delicious tothose who drink it. It will neither dull their senses nor befuddle them.

Koran 56:7-40
They shall recline on jeweled couches face to face, and there shalt wait onthem immortal youths with bowls and ewers and a cup of purest wine:

Koran 83:23-26
The righteous will surely dwell in bliss. Reclining upon soft couches theywill gaze around them: and in their faces you shall mark the glow of joy.They shall be given a pure wine to drink, securely sealed, whose very dregsare musk...

So far Mohammed has presented a very appetizing picture of Paradise, butthen it struck him that sex is no fun on an empty stomach. Besides that oneneeds lots of nutrition in order to have the energy to perform with so manyHouris and young boys. The prophet was an expert on this subject havinghonoured every one of his numerous wives and mistresses with a nightlyvisitation on one single night. Besides the only fruits he had ever gottento taste in this life was some dates and dry pomegranates. So heaven had tobe furbished with an inexhaustible supply of every variety of fruits. Relevant verses from the Koran:

Koran 13:35
This is the paradise which the righteous have been promised.. eternal areits fruits, and eternal are its shades..

Koran 37:40-48
But the true servants of God shall be well provided for, feasting on fruitand honored in the gardens of delight...

Koran 43:68-73
...Such will be the garden of which ye are made heirs for your deeds. Yeshall have therein abundance of fruit, from which ye shall havesatisfaction.

Koran 47:15
Here is a Parable Of the Garden which the righteous are promised: ...In itare rivers of milk of which the taste never changes; rivers of wine, a joyto those who drink; And rivers of honey pure and clear. In it there are forthem all kinds of fruits; And grace from their Lord..

Koran 55:52-53
In them there will be fruits of every kind, two and two. Then which of thefavors of your Lord will you deny ?

Koran 55:54-55
...The fruit of the gardens will be near and easy to reach. Then which ofthe favors of your Lord will you deny ?

Koran 55:68-69
In them will be Fruits, And dates and pomegranates: Then which of thefavors of your Lord will you deny ?

Koran 44:51-55
...Secure against all ills, they shall call for every kind of fruit..

Koran 56:7-40
They shall recline on jeweled couches face to face, and there shalt wait onthem immortal youths with ...fruits of their own choices and flesh of fowlsthat they relish..

Koran 76:13-21
...Reclining there upon soft couches, they shall feel neither the scorchingheat nor the biting cold. Trees will spread their shade around them, andfruits will hang in clusters over them...

Mohammed wanted to ensure that his followers would not be obsessed with'worldly things' in this life. So he made sure that they have plenty ofworldly things to pursue in heaven. The relevant verses from the Koran

Koran 22:23
As for those who have faith and who do good work, God will admit them togardens watered by running streams. They shall be decked with pearls and bracelets of gold, and arrayed in garments of silk. The relevant verses are here below:

Koran 43:68-73
Enter ye the Garden, Ye and your wives, in beauty and rejoicing. To themwill be passed round, dishes and goblets of gold: there will be there allthat soul could desire, all that the eyes could delight in: and ye shallabide there in..

Koran 55:70-77
..They shall recline on green cushions and fine carpets. Then which of thefavors of your Lord will you deny ?

Koran 44:51-55
As for the righteous, they shall be lodged in peace together amidst gardensand fountains, arrayed in rich silks and fine brocade...

Koran 55:54-55
They will recline on carpets, whose inner linings will be of rich brocade...

Koran 56:7-40
They shall recline on jeweled couches..

Koran 76:13-21
...They shall be arrayed in garments of fine green silk and rich brocade, andadorned with bracelets of silver..

Mohammed's promise of an Islamic Paradise that glittered with the fulfillment of all sorts of worldly desires was nothing but a sinister ploy to recruit those who had no hope or expectation of ever getting these things in their "real" lives. Knowing that they are assured of such a Paradise simply because they follow Islam, Muslims can go around committing plunder, rape, looting, murder and, yes, even blowing themselves up!
It is the picture of this "Paradise" that has motivated Muslims over the centuries to cut down people of other religions, to desecrate their places of worship and mistreat them in the name of Allah. Is this a "Religion of Peace" or is it "Madness!".. Is it a ´religion´ at all ??

For those who still believe there is someone can be called 'a good moslem', Have you ever asked yourselves and the so called 'good moslem' the following simple questions:

1. Do you agree to what osama bin laden and zarqawi have been doing? Yes or no
If yes, then he/she is like bin laden which means automatically he/she is not a good one..
If no, then

2. Do you agree that what they (bin laden, zawahry, zarkawy etc.) have been doing is based on clear and obvious verses from your Koran and hadeeth ?? yes or no
If yes, then .. you must agree on the fact that it is the Koran and hadeeth that must be trashed in the nearest garbage can .. If no, then you are a big liar because the whole world saw how many verses of the koran they used to recite when they commit any crime..any way

3. Do you think they are wrong? Yes or no..
If yes, then the Koran and hadeeth are wrong..
If no, then you are like them..

4. Do you believe in the same books, the Koran and hadeeth in which they believe? Yes or no..
If yes, then you cannot call yourself a good Moslem because you believe in the same source of terrorism,
If no then you can't call yourself a Moslem any more..

5. You can clearly see by your own eyes and judge by your own self if you can call yourself a bad Moslem or a good Moslem, if this term exists in the first place.

Know the Truth, Say the Truth, Spread the Truth

Here are some facts:

islam is the ONLY so called 'religion' that urges its followers (the moslems) to kill, steal and insult whoever and whatever nonmoslem.. wake up and stop the lies of Islam, please.

Islam is some kind of mafia .. have you ever heard about any member of any mafia tried to quit and kept alone??…no way .. the same has been happening in islam from day one ..
Mohamed forced the ppl to follow him by the force of his sowrd and terror of all types… and when he died, the ppl tried to get out of the trap named islam .. do you know what happened?? His successor abu baker raided them with the redda wars .. wars .. not only one ..and killed almost 700,000 people considered as (infidels = apostates = non believers of Islam).

Mohamed himself was a head of a mafia group .. later on they tried to cover it by giving it some kind of religious umbrella they used the word allah .. which was one of the pagans worshipped amongst other at that time ..

Mohamed himself was a criminal against humanity .. as he committed the crime categorized as Ethnical Cleansing .. he killed the jews and the Christians were then available in mecca and maddina ...

let's have a look on the issue of the major conflict between the jews and the Moslems over Jerusalem .. Moslems allege they have a right in there,

.. let's agree with them over this allegation for the sake of argument.. you will find that their alleged right is based on the fact that once they invaded and occupied the holy lands of Israel, they considered it islamic..and when the Isreallis very bravely liberated it from their filthy hands in 1967, the moslems started weaning about occupation etc.. trying to cover the truth .. the truth is that the lands have been liberated not occupied by the Israellis .

I shall inform you about how the Muslims have ´blessed´ the whole world with their loot, raid, brutal torture, plunderings, inhuman rapes, etc. all based on clear obvious scripture from the filthy Quran and the hadiths which have supported these messengers of the all "merciful" Allah.

As long as the muslims loot and raid the kafirs(non believers of Islam), it is completely justified. Ghazzua is an Arabic word for raid as well as killing and enslaving the kafirs. From this word the term Ghazi is derived which means honourable warrior of Islam who has killed many kafirs.

The distribution of the loot or booty, which includes the men, women and children, is done as prescribed by the well defined regulations stated in the Quran and the hadiths. Four fifths of the loot is to be shared by the barbaric, lecherous invaders who took part in the heinous plunderings while one fifth is reserved for the great ´Prophet´ or the Caliph and in their absence to the mullah who is in charge.

Such loots and raids were considered shameful acts in Pre-Islamic Arabia. But Mohammed revealed to his followers that since he was the last prophet for all time to come such raids were now sanctioned by Allah. Thus he legalised these inhuman acts of raid, plunder, loot and rape.

Let us closely examine the pattern that these barbaric invaders followed all over the world. This pattern is written down in the Quran; practised, perfected and prescribed by the so called prophet in his own life time and closely followed by the Caliphs later. Even in present time, this pattern is followed by all Muslim leaders who aspire for name and fame in this life and 72 houris (beautiful virgin women) in addition to 4 gay young boys, hereafter.

The pattern of islam is:
1. Invade the lands of the infidels.
2. Massacre as many infidel men, women and children as they like after winning a victory
3. Capture the survivors as slaves and confine the women in their harems as slave girls
4. Plunder every place and person for war, booty, a fifth of which (including the slaves) went to the Caliph or some other religious heads.
5. Demolish the places of worship of the infidels and build mosques in their places.
6. Defile and desecrate the deities and other symbols of the infidels' religion by throwing them into public squares or making into steps leading to the prayer area of the Muslims.

Once we give them the chance to live as humans applying our values, and teachings, they will use it to implant themselves .. and gradually over the years, in a very sneaky way, they try their best to destroy us from within inside by spreading their values, and gradually, we find ourselves a minority in our own country, then they enforce their filthy laws and criminal values .. that is what has been happening in all the mid east countries specially in Egypt and I am very frankly telling you people.. the price we have been paying is very high.. if you want to pay the same price, give them a chance.. and sure you will be more than very sorry ..

Herebelow, please find articles that support all the above: Loudspeaker call to Islamize America the 20years plan.. see how sneaky they are .. see if you are aware of all that and decide if you allow it any more.

Following is the Islamic message to the West


The Abrogating and Abrogated Qur’anic Verses = superceeding and superceeded verses
(please note that all the moslems today try to give you a picture of Islam when mohamed was in mecca.. this period lasted ONLY 12-13 years at the very beginning of mohamed´s movement, which have been abrogated completely by the prevailing abrogating teachings which have been in application for more than 1427 years so far.. so please be careful .. don~t let them mis inform you nor fool you).

Islam & Terrorism ie Islam IS TERRORIM

Eastern Christians Torn Asunder .. do you want the same to happen to you ?? AVOID PAYING THE VERY HIGH PRICES WE HAVE BEEN PAYING IN THE MID EAST

Quran Teaches

Mohammed without Camouflage

The connection of islam with the Nazi during WWII .. pics and docs

The maturity date for the moslems to pay for all the crimes committed by Islam over the past period since day one of their filthy mohamed, is very much due .. stop trying to delay it you filthy moslems .. wake up ..

Please, I beg every person come accross these facts to tell everyone around the world about the satanic Islam .. Make the whole world aware and conciouse.. Inform the senates, the representatives, the newspapers, the news agencies, TV stations, Radio Stations, even email campgains will do .. just expose Islam in every way possible .. and if you can kick all the Moslems out of your countries. .. that would be so great, because simply enough, you will be saving the future of your countries to the future of your kids and grand kids .. let them do something to the 'paradise' they came from..